Business and Economy
Saving The Tax Reform from the ‘Fake News’ Industry
By Isah Kamisu Madachi
The furore about whether the tax laws should be implemented or not has passed. The nationwide discussions about the discrepancy between the gazetted version and the version passed by the National Assembly have also faded.
January 1 has come and gone, and many changes, especially around digital transactions, are already beginning to manifest, as provided for under the new tax law. The consolidated tax laws under the tax reform regime are now in force and, as a citizen, I hope they are backed by strong accountability mechanisms and oversight to ensure that collected taxes are used for the right purposes.However, there is a major policy gap I observed at the very last minute of the law’s implementation which, if left unaddressed, may not only undermine the effectiveness of the law but also cause more harm to its objectives. If I were to estimate, I would say that less than 5% of Nigerians understand what the new tax law contains, how it works, and what it does not do. This knowledge gap has created a fertile ground for misinformation, disinformation, and fake news.
In the past few days, I have personally encountered many people who told me they had withdrawn all the money saved in their bank accounts and converted it to cash. They said they no longer trust cashless transactions. Some were told that every single transaction, irrespective of the amount, would attract a flat ₦50 charge.
Others were also told that just keeping money in their accounts would lead to monthly deductions, or that a 5% of their savings would be deducted every month for the tax. None of these claims could be traced to any provision of the law, yet they are widely being shared with absolute confidence.
Another unfortunate experience, was my encounter with a young and vibrant POS agent from whom I regularly withdraw cash. He told me he had shut down his business. According to what he was told, every ₦500,000 transaction would attract ₦15,000 in tax, every ₦5 million would attract ₦250,000, and any transaction above ₦1,000 would automatically be charged ₦50.
He was also told these deductions would be accumulated and collected at the end of the month, and that’s what frightened him most. He used to make transactions of an average of ₦50 million per month. With this information, he now chose to abandon his livelihood. Whether these claims are true or false is not the most important when one considers the damage such misinformation is already causing.
There is also a growing narrative, particularly on social media, that every transaction must now be clearly explained in the narration section. People are being told they must specify whether the money is for savings, shopping, gifts, rewards, profit, or salary. A counter-narrative exists saying this is false. Sadly, the average Nigerian does not know which version to believe. In an environment where official clarity is weak, rumours travel faster than facts.
If I were to document all the misinformation circulating about the new tax law, it would take more than a newspaper opinion. New versions emerge almost every hour. The most alarming outcome of this misinformation is how people are altering their economic behaviour. Businesses are being abandoned. Trust in digital finance is being eroded. People are deserting the cashless system out of fear, believing their money is no longer safe in the banking system.
The only effort I am aware of to address this information gap is the reported engagement of social media influencers to enlighten the public. If this effort has begun, it is not enough. If it has not, then it is urgently needed. But beyond influencers, one must ask: what happened to local radio stations? Radio remains the primary source of information for millions of Nigerians, especially in rural areas. The law should be broken down and discussed in local languages on local radio.
There are also a proliferation of online television platforms operating across social media spaces. The tax reform committee should strategically collaborate with them to explain the law in simple and creative ways. Influencers alone cannot carry this burden. Public communication must be broader, more structured, and more deliberate.
The Federal Ministry of Information also has a central role to play here. There is an urgent need for a simplified version of the tax law and other versions translated into local languages, and disseminated in collaboration with state ministries of information. Students, heads of households, community leaders, traders, and small business owners must all be deliberately engaged. Town hall meetings, especially in peri-urban communities, should be organized. They are necessary to counter the scale of misinformation already circulating.
When people are largely unaware of what a law entails, dysfunction is inevitable. The law may exist, but its implementation will be undermined by fear, resistance, and unintended consequences. By the look of things, those who understand the new tax law are currently the fewest in Nigeria, even among the highly educated. If this gap remains wide open, the law may struggle to achieve its intended outcomes.
Now that it’s here, I hope, and I genuinely pray, that if effectively implemented and properly communicated, the new tax laws will become one of the long-awaited channels for fixing many of Nigeria’s challenges. But without deliberate public education, I doubt if the policy can yield the desired result.
isahkamisumadachi@gmail.com
Business and Economy
Capital Goes Where Value is Clear and Nigeria Has That Value – Ojulari
By Aliyu Musa
The Group Chief Executive Officer of NNPC Limited, Engr. Bashir Bayo Ojulari, has delivered a characteristically direct and pragmatic assessment of Nigeria and Africa’s energy future.
He stated this at the CERAWeek 2026, declaring that the country’s fundamentals are strong, its value proposition clear, and its focus now squarely on execution.
Speaking on the opening day of the world’s premier energy gathering, held under the theme “Convergence and Competition: Energy, Technology and Geopolitics,” Ojulari told a global audience of energy leaders, including C-suite executives, energy secretaries and government ministers, that Nigeria’s strategy is grounded in realism, partnership, and disciplined delivery.
“Capital goes where value is clear, and Nigeria has that value,” he stated, setting the tone for a leadership dialogue that outlined a pragmatic approach to balancing the country’s immediate energy needs with its long-term transition ambitions. The GCEO articulated NNPC’s core philosophy with characteristic clarity: “We are not choosing between today and tomorrow; we are funding the future with the present.”
At the fireside chat anchored by Dan Pratt, S&P Global’s Senior Vice President, Upstream Solutions, Ojulari explained that Africa remains dependent on hydrocarbons for revenue and foreign exchange, making sustained upstream production non-negotiable. Additionally, with over 600 trillion cubic feet of proven reserves, gas represents not merely a transition fuel but a strategic economic lever for industrialisation and energy security across the continent.
According to the GCEO, “Nigeria is the reliable destination for energy investment the world needs. The country has positioned itself as a dependable supplier, riding on the established legacies of stable policies, improved energy infrastructure security, partnerships, and, lastly, the orientation of the government. The President has given NNPC the autonomy to act on its behalf and consolidate commercial solutions that are long-lasting.”
“Balance is not about equal allocation; it is about optimal sequencing,” Ojulari stated, outlining a portfolio where oil sustains value today, gas underpins industrial growth, and transition investments are targeted and disciplined. He further highlighted the critical role of partnerships in de-risking Nigeria’s deepwater assets, noting that global players like Shell and Eni bring not only capital but execution capability, technology, and project discipline—particularly for assets like OPL 245 and other deepwater developments.
According to the oil executive, the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) has now firmly established regulatory certainty, while infrastructure gaps are being closed through targeted investments and security is being strengthened through a more robust architecture. “When the fundamentals are right, partnerships scale naturally,” he added.
Addressing Nigeria’s long-discussed gas potential, the GCEO noted that what is different now is execution discipline. Three key enablers are receiving focused attention: commercial pricing across the value chain, critical infrastructure like the AKK (Ajaokuta-Kaduna-Kano) pipeline, and bankable contracts that provide investor certainty. On the balance between domestic gas needs and LNG exports, Engr. Ojulari described a dynamic approach of portfolio optimisation—allocating gas where it delivers the highest combined national and commercial value.
The GCEO articulated a clear strategic shift, moving from resource ownership to resource monetisation. He emphasized that unlocking Nigeria’s significant proven but undeveloped reserves requires commercial discipline, competitive fiscal frameworks, and strong partnerships. Deepwater remains a priority because it offers scale, it is less exposed to onshore challenges, and attracts global capital.
CERAWeek 2026, hosted by S&P Global, runs from March 23–27 in Houston, Texas, bringing together over 10,000 global energy leaders, executives, and officials to explore the convergence of energy, technology, and geopolitics.
Business and Economy
Court Adjourns Multiple Taxation Suit as FCT Private School Owners Drag Authorities to Court
By Wumi Tewogbade, Abuja
A Magistrates’ Court sitting in Wuse Zone 2, Abuja, on Wednesday adjourned to April 16, 2026, a suit filed by the National Association of Private School Owners (NAPS) against the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Abuja Municipal Area Council (AMAC) over alleged multiple taxation, while urging all parties to explore amicable resolution through dialogue.
The court, after preliminary proceedings, emphasized the need for restraint and constructive engagement among the parties, noting that dialogue remains a viable path toward resolving the dispute without prolonged litigation.
NAPS had approached the court challenging what it described as overlapping and multiple tax demands imposed on private schools by both the FCTA and area councils, particularly AMAC.
Speaking to journalists shortly after the sitting, counsel to the association, Alexander N. Ogbo, confirmed the adjournment and provided insight into the substance of the case.
According to him, the dispute arose from what ought to be an institutional policy matter ordinarily handled by area councils in their dealings with schools, but which has now seen intervention from the FCTA through its agencies.
He explained that the development has resulted in multiple taxation, with schools receiving similar demands from AMAC, other area councils, and departments of the FCTA on the same issues.
“This overlap is creating institutional conflict and disrupting the smooth operation of schools, including their academic activities,” he said, adding that the situation has become increasingly serious.
Ogbo stressed that the core issue before the court is the challenge against multiple taxation, noting that private schools are caught in the middle of competing authorities.
“As the saying goes, when two elephants fight, the grass suffers. In this case, the schools are the grass, while the ‘elephants’ are the FCTA Health Department and AMAC,” he stated.
He further called on the FCTA and area councils to harmonize their responsibilities and establish a unified regulatory framework that would provide clarity for private school operators.
“Schools are not opposed to regulation; we simply need clarity. At the moment, there is confusion as to whether to comply with AMAC or the FCTA’s Public Health Department,” he added.
On the role of the court, the counsel noted that it is providing a neutral platform for all parties to present their cases and clarify procedural concerns, particularly regarding demand notices issued by the FCTA’s Health Department.
He also reiterated the association’s openness to settlement, emphasizing that dialogue remains the preferred option if the authorities are willing to engage constructively.
In her remarks, President of NAPS, Rukayat Agboola, maintained that private schools recognize regulatory oversight but insisted that such processes should be streamlined through the appropriate authority, particularly the Education Secretariat.
She said the association prefers that all directives concerning schools be channeled through a single regulatory body to avoid confusion and duplication.
Some members of the association who spoke to journalists described private schools as critical partners in national development, contributing to education and employment, and cautioned against treating them as revenue sources.
They decried what they termed excessive and multiple levies, including a controversial child-based tax reportedly pegged at five per cent of tuition fees per term, warning that non-compliance could affect school accreditation.
The plaintiffs are seeking judicial intervention to halt the alleged multiple taxation and compel the relevant authorities to streamline their regulatory and fiscal responsibilities.
Business and Economy
Tax collection : No going back on harmonization – FCT-IRS, NRS
By Wumi Tewogbade, Abuja
The Federal Capital Territory – Internal Revenue Service (FCT-IRS) on Monday, said there is no going back in aligning with national fiscal reforms.
Executive Chairman of the FCT Internal Revenue Service (FCT-IRS), Abdullahi Ango, stated this at the stakeholders’ engagement forum themed ‘Harmonizing Revenue Systems and Implementing New Tax Laws,’ on Monday.
He said harmonization, which is a core focus of the forum, is not a power grab but a push for efficiency.
“We are creating a system where revenue grows as constitutionally mandated, but collection becomes seamless,” he stated.
With the FCT marking 50 years since its conceptualization in 1976, Ango stressed the urgency of infrastructural funding. He praised the FCT Minister, Barrister Nyesom Wike, for driving investments in roads, hospitals, and schools, while noting that the FCT-IRS’ role is to ensure sustainable revenue for these projects.
Though he declined to specify timelines for domesticating new tax laws, Ango assured stakeholders that collaboration with the legislature was underway.
He also dismissed claims of excessive FCT revenue, revealing a fivefold increase in collections early in 2026 compared to 2025 but cautioned, “Revenue is never enough.”
On overlapping taxes, he confirmed that Wike-led initiatives are resolving conflicts among FCT stakeholders, with the FCT-IRS at the helm.
The Executive Chairman of the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS), Dr. Zach Adedeji., who presented President Bola Tinubu’s fiscal agenda, described the forum “timely and strategic.”
He underscored the need for policy coherence and inter-agency collaboration, warning that fragmented systems “undermine compliance and raise business costs.”
Describing the FCT as a symbol of Nigeria’s governance, Adedeji advocated a digital revolution, declaring: “Modern tax systems are data-driven. Manual inefficiencies must edrawn
Major key proposals drawn during the forum include integrated databases, e-payment platforms, and real-time analytics to curb leakages.
Adedeji hailed the new harmonization laws as tools to eliminate multiplicity of taxes, particularly for SMEs, and urged subnational authorities to domesticate these reforms.
“Revenue mobilization must be rules-based and transparent,” he asserted, commending the FCT Minister and FCT-IRS for fostering dialogue.
The two chairmen agreed that harmonization hinges on legislative clarity, technology, and stakeholder buy-in.
As the FCT strides toward its golden jubilee, the duo expresses hope that the forum’s outcomes would set a benchmark for Nigeria’s fiscal future, one where efficiency meets equity, and revenue fuels a “livable, thriving Federal Capital Territory.”
