Burna Boy and Shakira released “Daï Daï” as the official anthem of the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

The song will support a global education initiative targeting $100 million in funding for disadvantaged children through royalties and donations.

FIFA confirmed that the 2026 World Cup final will feature a Super Bowl-style halftime concert for the first time.

Grammy Award-winning Nigerian artist Burna Boy strengthened his position as one of Africa’s leading global music figures after collaborating with Shakira on “Daï Daï,” the official anthem of the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

The track, released globally on Thursday, May 14, became the second single from the tournament’s official album and received a significantly warmer reception than “Lighter,” the first single performed by Jelly Roll and Carín León, which drew mixed reactions from audiences.

On her Instagram account, Shakira released a one-minute video revealing the title selected for the 2026 World Cup. The footage showed the singer walking through Maracanã Stadium after a live performance attended by a large crowd while carrying “Trionda,” the tournament’s official ball.

“Today, the road to the FIFA World Cup 2026 reached a new milestone with the release of the competition’s official song, Daï Daï, performed by Shakira and Burna Boy via Sony Music Latin,”FIFA said on its official website.

Afrobeats Secures a Global Stage

“Daï Daï” blends Latin pop and Afrobeats influences. The expression reportedly derives from Italian and means “Go!” — a universal chant of encouragement.

Shakira and Burna Boy combined their vocals and stage energy to celebrate football’s global appeal and cross-cultural exchange.

Damini Ebunoluwa Ogulu, known professionally as Burna Boy, plays a central role in the project. The 35-year-old artist brought Afrobeats’ signature sound and his international profile to the song, while Shakira contributed her Latin pop identity.

The collaboration further established Afrobeats as a major force in global music and positioned Burna Boy as one of the defining musical faces of the 2026 tournament.

Earlier this spring, Burna Boy became the first African artist to headline a solo concert at Stade de France. He also released his ninth studio album, “No Sign of Weakness” , in July 2025. The project remained rooted in Afrobeats while featuring collaborations with Mick Jagger, Travis Scott and Stromae.

Meanwhile, FIFA confirmed that the 2026 World Cup final, scheduled for July 19 at MetLife Stadium, will include a halftime concert inspired by the Super Bowl format for the first time.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup will run from June 11 to July 19 across the United States, Canada and Mexico. The tournament will also mark the first edition featuring 48 national teams.

“Daï Daï” Supports Children’s Education

The “Daï Daï” initiative also carries a philanthropic dimension.

In partnership with FIFA and Global Citizen, Shakira aims to raise $100 million to improve access to education and football programs for disadvantaged children worldwide.

The project will direct all royalties generated by the song to the Education Fund. Meanwhile, Sony Music announced an initial donation of $250,000 to support the initiative and expand its social impact.

Ubrick F. Quenum

Flight FC Gboko etched their name into history after securing a hard-fought 1-0 victory over Lobi Stars FC to clinch their first-ever Benue State FA Cup title.

The decisive moment came early in the contest when Kpamor Gemanen struck in the 20th minute, a goal that ultimately proved enough to separate both sides in a tightly contested final. Showing resilience and discipline, the Gboko-based side held firm against pressure from the more established Lobi Stars outfit to see out the historic win.

Dubbed the “Gboko Transporters,” Flight FC delivered a composed performance, combining defensive solidity with tactical awareness to protect their slender lead until the final whistle.

The triumph marks a significant milestone for the club, underlining their rise within Benue football and signaling their growing ambition on the domestic scene.

For Lobi Stars, it was a disappointing outing despite their pedigree, as they were unable to break down a determined Flight FC side that had its sights firmly set on making history.

Celebrations erupted at full-time as Flight FC Gboko players, officials, and supporters savoured a landmark achievement that will be remembered for years to come.

The decision by the CAF Appeal Board to strip Senegal of the 2025 AFCON title did not come from pressure or speculation. Instead, it was the culmination of conclusions from a set of detailed and consistent official reports.

Those reports now form the foundation of the ruling that awarded Morocco a 3-0 win against Senegal.

According to Médias24, multiple documents reviewed by CAF describe the same sequence of events late in the match. In the 97th minute, tensions escalated quickly after the referee awarded a penalty awarded to Morocco.

Senegal’s players reacted strongly. The referee’s report notes that, on instructions from head coach Pape Thiaw, the players left the pitch and returned to the dressing room.

The match stopped at that point, and play only resumed several minutes later.

That moment became the turning point of the case.

CAF’s decision focused on that exact sequence. And the official reports all describe not just a protest, but a full interruption of the match after Senegal’s players left the field.

From a regulatory perspective, that detail matters.

Under CAF rules, leaving the pitch without the referee’s authorization triggers automatic consequences. And the return to the field does not cancel what already happened.

Consistent reports across all levels
Indeed, both the referee’s account and other official reports make this exact case.

The match commissioner confirmed that most Senegalese players left the field, forcing a temporary suspension. The general coordinator described strong reactions from players, staff, and substitutes, especially after the VAR decision.

Security reports added further context. They mention attempts by some supporters to approach the pitch and objects being thrown from the stands. The atmosphere became tense, and security teams had to step in to contain the situation.

All in all, these reports do not contradict each other. They instead converge on one key point: the match was disrupted after Senegal’s players left the field.

From protest to regulatory breach
CAF’s ruling does not treat the incident as a simple protest.

Disagreement with refereeing decisions is part of football. Leaving the pitch is not.

That distinction defines the case.

Analyst Samir Bennis has made the same argument in his recent analyses. “The Senegalese team’s conduct amounted to a withdrawal from the field of play,” he recently wrote, pointing to both video evidence and official reports.

Bennis has also stressed that Article 82 of the CAF regulations is clear and cannot be subject to creative interpretations under any circumstances. The article unambiguously stipulates that a team that refuses to play or leaves the pitch without authorization “shall be considered to have lost.”

There is no clause allowing the act to be reversed if the team later returns. There is also no minimum duration required.

In that context, Senegal’s actions fall under both refusal to play and withdrawal, a combination that is difficult to defend from a legal standpoint.

A decision rooted in structure, not narrative

The broader debate around the final has grown beyond the match itself. Different interpretations and narratives continue to circulate as both camps anxiously await the final verdict from the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

But CAF’s decision follows a structured approach.

It relies on:

Official match reports
Consistent accounts from multiple officials
Clear regulatory provisions
That combination leaves limited room for ambiguity.

As Médias 24’s analysis shows, the reasoning behind the ruling is built step by step, focusing on the rule as written and the facts as documented.

What comes next
The case now moves to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

CAS will not revisit the emotions of the match or the controversy around the penalty. It will focus on whether CAF correctly applied its own regulations.

That brings the case back to its core question: what are the consequences when a team leaves the field during a match?

CAF has already answered that question.

And based on the reports and the rules, that answer rests less on interpretation and more on the application of the text itself

Source: medias24