General News
MIT Spinout Turns Plastic Waste into Resilient Building Materials
Atlas Building Composites is commercializing MIT research to turn plastic waste into parts for buildings and other infrastructure.
The world needs more homes. The world also has too much plastic. Perhaps the only thing those two problems have in common is that they’re hard to solve.
Atlas Building Composites, a spinout of MIT, is on a mission to address both problems with a single solution. The company has developed an AI-powered robotic manufacturing platform capable of turning single-use plastics into durable building materials.
The company emerged from MIT HAUS, a research effort in the MIT Department of Mechanical Engineering that’s short for “Home Architecture for Universal Sustainability.” Atlas uses waterless plastic recycling and large-scale composite additive manufacturing technology to make parts like home foundations, decks, and trusses for walls, floors, and roofs.
“Our mission is to convert waste plastic pollution into durable composites to build 1 billion homes,” says Atlas chair and co-founder A.J. Perez who is also an MIT research scientist.
“You can’t divorce these things from each other. We’re not here just to build homes, and we’re not here just to recycle plastic. The conventional way of building homes involves cutting down trees, mining, refining, and a bunch of other dirty activities. We want to avoid all that and address all the plastic bound for our oceans and landfills. We’re turning bottles into buildings.”
Atlas’ parts are already being used to support barns, sheds, decks, and docks. Most recently, the company supplied the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with American-made recycled composite trusses to construct a 40-foot bridge in a Massachusetts wetland.
Perez and Atlas co-founder Matt Pouliot envision deploying thousands of their AI robotic production systems around the world. A key enabler for that scale is the company’s ability to recycle low-grade plastic into building components without water.
“This is key to democratizing recycling.
“Now, every country around the world, regardless of their water access, will be able to do something about their plastic. We strive to study these issues in the real world, not just a lab. When you talk to government officials about creating a new recycling facility, they have to get the local water agency involved, there’s permitting, etc. A lot of that work disappears with the waterless recycling process.”
Research for impact
Since earning his PhD at MIT, Perez has been developing advanced fabrication techniques for homes and new techniques for plastic recycling. In 2019, he started MIT HAUS with David Hardt, MIT’s Ralph E. and Eloise F. Cross Professor in Manufacturing.
“It started with the simple mission of enabling the production of 1 billion homes over a 30-year period,” Perez says.
“Then we realized how much the materials needed for those homes would strain global supply chains.”
Perez says building those homes using conventional methods would require a doubling of global production capacity for materials like concrete, not to mention a dramatic acceleration of global deforestation.
“That’s where the light bulb went off.
“There’s this other problem humanity has, which is 8 gigatons of plastic that have been produced and are polluting our oceans, rivers, and cities. We decided to plug two really big, hairy problems together.”
Perez met Pouliot, a former Maine senator, and the pair started Atlas to commercialize the technology Perez had been developing at MIT. The founders worked with MIT’s Technology Licensing Office and have since worked with researchers at other universities to independently develop technology for the company’s robotic manufacturing platform, which the founders call the Atlas Factory Stack.
First, single-use plastic from water bottles and other objects is shredded and fed into the Atlas system, where it is melted and fused with American-made fiberglass to make it stronger than wood. From there, a large-scale 3D printer creates the parts, including trusses for floors, walls, roofs, and bridges.
Through research at MIT, Perez has shown large composite trusses can be printed in under 13 minutes and support over 4,000 pounds, exceeding key building standards.
“At MIT, we’ve demonstrated we can produce 60 to 80 pounds of parts per hour, and the systems we’re specifying in Atlas factories operate in the 150 to 200 pound per hour range,” Perez says. “There’s the potential for our robotic manufacturing platform to produce each part at a lower cost than injection molding, and it’s far more flexible and convenient. For example, we can manufacture the parts in the reverse order so that they’ll be placed on the finished goods pallet next to the machine.”
The founders envision Atlas as a technology provider enabling the creation of home factories close to wherever homes need to be built. Today, each Atlas factory cell is capable of producing the structural framing components for about one small home per day.
“The old way of doing things would be some huge factory in China would mass produce one type of part and ship it far away.
“I don’t think that’s good for the planet. Another reason we don’t use injection molding is economic: Mega factories don’t produce as many jobs and have a much higher carbon footprint. We want this to be localized to benefit local communities. The plastic is already everywhere. The more local Atlas is, the lower the cost and footprint.”
Going global
Plastics last far longer than wood, especially for applications where they’re in contact with the ground or water. That adds to the company’s environmental benefits.
“If you get a material into the building world and it does its job, it’s going to be used for a very long time and not need to be recycled again for a very long time,” Pouliot says. “That’s important because when you recycle something over and over again, it degrades. This is one of the most sustainable use cases for recycled petrochemical products.”
Atlas’ bridge with the Army Corps of Engineers was installed in less than a day. The founders are also in talks with international franchise partners to deploy the Atlas Factory Stack across the globe.
“To accomplish our mission, I fundamentally believe it’s not going to be one far-away company dominating the industry,” Perez says. “It’s going to be every country leveraging Atlas Factory Stacks to create local recycling jobs, local factory jobs, local construction jobs, and to stimulate their economies with local materials.”
General News
As Nigerian Labour’s Mussle Flexing Continues, Ajaero Says: NLC Can Negotiate alone, But TUC Can’t
By Son Tertsea, Abuja
Joe Ajaero, President of the Nigeria Labour Congress, has asserted that NLC has the authority to negotiate alone on labour matters, countering the position of his Trade Union Congress counterpart, Festus Osifo, that both labour bodies are equal partners to participate in such negotiations.
Ajaero said the TUC could negotiate alongside the NLC but could not independently negotiate with labour authorities, citing the principle of most workers’ representatives under the International Labour Organisation.
Speaking Monday as a guest on Channels Television’s The Morning Brief, he held this position amid the disagreement between the two labour bodies over the N70,000 transport allowance approved by the Federal Government for workers across all levels for six months. In his words:
“TUC can negotiate along with NLC but NLC can negotiate alone based on the principle of most workers representatives of the ILO.”
Ajaero gave an example of how the TUC is required to present its proposals to the NLC for onward submission when engaging with the ILO.
“TUC sent their negotiation alone ahead of the ILO conference but they returned it back and I had to minute on it.
“They have to send their list here for me to forward it; that is the position of the ILO. NLC determines how TUC participates.”
Ajaero further stated that the Ministry of Labour and other labour authorities would not engage with the TUC independently on workers’ welfare negotiations. In other words:
“TUC can’t negotiate alone; if they are saying and it is implied, it does not happen. I don’t think the Ministry of Labour or the Labour Authority will allow that to happen.”
Osifo’s claim that the TUC had a significant number of workers in the federal civil service, Ajaero countered saying that the Trade Union Amendment Act 2005 and the 1999 Constitution, have given workers the right to choose their unions.
“The 2005 Trade Union Amendment Act made membership of trade unions voluntary.
“It is the worker that determines the union he belongs to;
“Section 40 of the Nigerian 1999 Constitution as amended was clear that every Nigerian worker has the right to belong to any trade union, political or religious institution of his choice, which gives every worker the latitude to belong to any union of their choice.”
Ajaero also argued that Osifo’s claim about the number of workers represented by the TUC did not reflect the composition of the Joint National Public Service Negotiating Council.
According to him, only one of the eight union bodies in the joint council belongs to the TUC, while the remaining seven are affiliated with the NLC.
He further argued that the TUC-affiliated union in the joint body had subjected its powers to the council.
In the course of the programme, Ajaero explained how the N70,000 transport allowance agreement was reached, saying NLC had issued an ultimatum to the Federal Government before the intervention was agreed upon.
“We gave government an ultimatum; we were supposed to start an action. The government asked for four days to meet with us, and we met, and they resumed sitting after four days.
“After the meeting, the 70k allowance came up.”
General News
100-level Plateau Varsity Female Student Abducted by Kidnappers, Shoot Another
By Michael Lim, Jos
A 100-level female student of Plateau State University, Bokkos, has been abducted by gunmen suspected to be kidnappers while another person sustained injuries during an attack on off-campus student residential areas in Bokkos Local Government Area of Plateau State.
According to reports, the incidents which occurred on Saturday evening at about 8:40pm, had heightened concerns over the safety of students residing outside the university campus.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, a student confirmed the abduction to journalists on Sunday, saying the victim, a 100-level female student, had gone out with another female colleague when she was abducted.
“Yes, the student was taken away by the attackers last night, and we have not seen her since then. She is staying off campus, but I don’t know her,”
The source lamented the growing insecurity in the council area and appealed to security agencies to ensure the safe rescue of the victim.
A staff of the university, speaking anonymously confirmed the incident saying the institution was aware of the development. In his words:
“The university is aware of a reported shooting incident in one of the off-campus student residential areas. This would be the second such incident in four weeks.”
According to him, although the incident did not occur within the university campus, the management was deeply concerned about the safety of students living outside the institution.
“While the incident did not occur within the university campus, which remains our direct responsibility to secure, we are deeply concerned that any of our students living off campus should face such threats to their safety.”
He added that the administration of the Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Shedrack Best, was determined to provide safe and secure on-campus accommodation for students.
“The administration of Prof. Shedrack Best has made concerted efforts to provide safe and secure on-campus accommodation for all students.
“However, due to severe financial constraints, the university is currently only able to accommodate about 1,000 students in its dormitories.”
“The university will continue to engage relevant authorities to expand both accommodation and security for our nearly 20,000 students,” he said.
Efforts to get the reaction of the Plateau State Police Command spokesperson, Alabo Alfred, on the matter were unsuccessful.
General News
NLC Says Cost of Living, Naira’s Value, Transportation, Housing … To shape Wage Negotiations
–Calls NUJ to fight for members
By Seyi Balogun, Lagos
The Nigeria Labour Congress, NLC, has resolved that wage discussions should commence far before April 2027 implementation date while identifying inflation, the cost of living, the value of the naira, transportation, housing and workers’ purchasing power as major issues that would shape the next national minimum wage negotiations.
The NLC President, Joe Ajaero, spoke weekend in Lagos, at the 2026 Labour Writers Association of Nigeria, LAWAN, Annual Conference in Lagos, on the theme; “Workers at the centre of Nigeria’s Political Transition: Defending rights, advancing welfare and building economic justice”.
In his words:
“We must examine inflation, the value of the naira and other factors affecting workers’ purchasing power. The new minimum wage should be informed by the cost-of-living index and prevailing inflationary trends”
NLC also expressed concern over the poor welfare conditions of Nigerian journalists.
He said journalists face daunting harsh working conditions including inadequate salaries, job insecurity, weak pension arrangements and the absence of effective social security protection, calling on the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) to take its trade union responsibilities more seriously.
According to him, it would be counter productive to negotiate a new minimum wage without establishing what the proposed amount could actually purchase.
He warned that workers should not find themselves receiving an improved salary only for inflation to erode its value within a few months, forcing them to demand another increase. In his words:
“We must not approach the next minimum wage negotiation by simply demanding millions or billions without considering other economic factors.
“We must consider inflation, the value of the currency and other issues affecting the economy. The new minimum wage should be determined with reference to the cost-of-living index and inflationary trends.
“If the government agrees that wages should be indexed to inflation, then an increase in inflation should lead to an appropriate adjustment in wages.
“Alternatively, we must examine the prices of essential commodities and services. How much does a bag of garri cost? How much is house rent? How much does transportation cost?
These are the factors that must inform the negotiations.
“We cannot simply announce that we want ₦100,000 or ₦50,000 without establishing how those figures relate to the actual cost of living. This is important because, over the years, we have repeatedly found ourselves in a situation where workers receive a salary increase, but within a few months, inflation erodes its value and they are already demanding another adjustment. We must avoid that situation.
“The government must take a more decisive position on solving the transportation problem. Giving workers ₦70,000 as a transportation intervention for six months is not enough, although it provides some relief. For somebody earning ₦70,000, receiving another ₦70,000 is certainly meaningful.
“But what happens after six months?There are also other policies that must be considered, particularly transportation. We cannot accept a situation where workers receive ₦70,000 as temporary relief and, after six months, the government simply withdraws the intervention without providing an alternative.
“Nobody should assume that because the six-month period has expired, workers must return to their previous state of poverty. We have left Egypt; we cannot go back to Egypt.
“As far as the minimum wage negotiations are concerned, the new negotiations must recognise the existing wage structure and the improvements already achieved.
You cannot begin negotiating from a position that ignores those gains.
“You cannot expect workers to return to the old minimum wage position of ₦70,000 after receiving the additional intervention. We must consolidate the gains already made.
On the welfare of journalists, the NLC challenged the NUJ to intensify its involvement in collective bargaining and negotiations with media employers to secure better conditions of service for its members.
The labour leader questioned the absence of effective collective bargaining agreements in the media industry, asking: “What is the minimum wage for media workers across the country? What collective bargaining agreements exist between journalists and their employers?”
On journalism, he observed that, most journalists depend on employment in media organisations for their livelihoods, unlike other professionals who can establish private businesses or independent practices. He argued:
“Therefore, the NUJ must be actively involved in negotiating better welfare packages for its members.”
Ajaero also called for the revival of the proposed journalists’ village initiative and partnerships between journalists and mortgage institutions to enable media workers to own houses through affordable payment arrangements.
On job security and retirement benefits, the labour leader lamented that many journalists frequently move from one media organisation to another because of poor remuneration and unfavourable conditions of service.
He noted that low salaries also translate into inadequate pension contributions, leaving many workers financially vulnerable after retirement.
The NLC President called for improved salaries, stronger employment protection, better pension arrangements and comprehensive social security provisions for journalists.
