Sports
CAF’s AFCON Final Decision Built on Reports, Not Preferential Interpretation
The decision by the CAF Appeal Board to strip Senegal of the 2025 AFCON title did not come from pressure or speculation. Instead, it was the culmination of conclusions from a set of detailed and consistent official reports.
Those reports now form the foundation of the ruling that awarded Morocco a 3-0 win against Senegal.
According to Médias24, multiple documents reviewed by CAF describe the same sequence of events late in the match. In the 97th minute, tensions escalated quickly after the referee awarded a penalty awarded to Morocco.
Senegal’s players reacted strongly. The referee’s report notes that, on instructions from head coach Pape Thiaw, the players left the pitch and returned to the dressing room.
The match stopped at that point, and play only resumed several minutes later.
That moment became the turning point of the case.
CAF’s decision focused on that exact sequence. And the official reports all describe not just a protest, but a full interruption of the match after Senegal’s players left the field.
From a regulatory perspective, that detail matters.
Under CAF rules, leaving the pitch without the referee’s authorization triggers automatic consequences. And the return to the field does not cancel what already happened.
Consistent reports across all levels
Indeed, both the referee’s account and other official reports make this exact case.
The match commissioner confirmed that most Senegalese players left the field, forcing a temporary suspension. The general coordinator described strong reactions from players, staff, and substitutes, especially after the VAR decision.
Security reports added further context. They mention attempts by some supporters to approach the pitch and objects being thrown from the stands. The atmosphere became tense, and security teams had to step in to contain the situation.
All in all, these reports do not contradict each other. They instead converge on one key point: the match was disrupted after Senegal’s players left the field.
From protest to regulatory breach
CAF’s ruling does not treat the incident as a simple protest.
Disagreement with refereeing decisions is part of football. Leaving the pitch is not.
That distinction defines the case.
Analyst Samir Bennis has made the same argument in his recent analyses. “The Senegalese team’s conduct amounted to a withdrawal from the field of play,” he recently wrote, pointing to both video evidence and official reports.
Bennis has also stressed that Article 82 of the CAF regulations is clear and cannot be subject to creative interpretations under any circumstances. The article unambiguously stipulates that a team that refuses to play or leaves the pitch without authorization “shall be considered to have lost.”
There is no clause allowing the act to be reversed if the team later returns. There is also no minimum duration required.
In that context, Senegal’s actions fall under both refusal to play and withdrawal, a combination that is difficult to defend from a legal standpoint.
A decision rooted in structure, not narrative
The broader debate around the final has grown beyond the match itself. Different interpretations and narratives continue to circulate as both camps anxiously await the final verdict from the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).
But CAF’s decision follows a structured approach.
It relies on:
Official match reports
Consistent accounts from multiple officials
Clear regulatory provisions
That combination leaves limited room for ambiguity.
As Médias 24’s analysis shows, the reasoning behind the ruling is built step by step, focusing on the rule as written and the facts as documented.
What comes next
The case now moves to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).
CAS will not revisit the emotions of the match or the controversy around the penalty. It will focus on whether CAF correctly applied its own regulations.
That brings the case back to its core question: what are the consequences when a team leaves the field during a match?
CAF has already answered that question.
And based on the reports and the rules, that answer rests less on interpretation and more on the application of the text itself
Source: medias24
Sports
Harry Kane Ends England’s 25-Year Wait As Alexia Putellas Clinches Third Ballon d’Or In Historic London Ceremony
By Felix Umande
England captain Harry Kane and Spain midfielder Alexia Putellas have been crowned winners of the Men’s and Women’s Ballon d’Or at the 70th Ballon d’Or ceremony held at the London Palladium on Monday, October 26, 2026.
It was a historic night as the gala was staged outside France for the first time since its inception in 1956, moving to London to honour Stanley Matthews, the inaugural winner, on the award’s 70th anniversary. The event was co-organised by France Football and UEFA and hosted by Thierry Henry and Kate Scott.
Kane won the Men’s Ballon d’Or after a phenomenal 2025-26 season, scoring 73 goals in 65 competitive matches for Bayern Munich and England. He led Bayern to a league and cup double and England to a third-place finish at the 2026 World Cup.
The 33-year-old becomes the first Englishman to win football’s most prestigious individual prize since Michael Owen in 2001, joining an elite list that includes Sir Stanley Matthews, Bobby Charlton and Kevin Keegan.
“It being here in London as well has made it extra special. Thank you to everyone who voted for me. I can imagine it was really tough this year,” an emotional Kane said as the Palladium erupted with chants of “Harry, Harry”.
Kane also claimed the Gerd Müller Trophy for Men’s Best Striker. He beat Real Madrid’s Kylian Mbappé, who finished second, and Barcelona’s Lamine Yamal, who finished third.
Putellas won the Women’s Ballon d’Or for a third time, after her previous wins in 2021 and 2022, joining compatriot Aitana Bonmati on three titles.
The 32-year-old captained Barcelona Femení to a quadruple — Liga F, Copa de la Reina, Spanish Super Cup and Women’s Champions League — scoring 26 goals and registering 15 assists in 53 matches, before completing a summer move to Women’s Super League side London City Lionesses.
“I don’t know what to say. This prize is for Barcelona. That so many Barça players were nominated says a lot about the season we had. It was my honour to be your captain,” she said.
She finished ahead of Poland striker Ewa Pajor and Jamaica’s Khadija Shaw.
Spain dominated the night, claiming eight of 13 awards.
Full list of winners at Ballon d’Or 2026:
- Men’s Ballon d’Or: Harry Kane (Bayern Munich / England)
- Women’s Ballon d’Or: Alexia Putellas (Barcelona / Spain)
- Kopa Trophy – Men’s Young Talent: Lamine Yamal (Barcelona / Spain) — for a record third consecutive year
- Women’s Young Talent: Vicky López (Barcelona / Spain)
- Men’s Coach of the Year – Johan Cruyff Trophy: Luis de la Fuente (Spain) — after leading Spain to World Cup glory
- Women’s Coach of the Year: Pere Romeu (Barcelona)
- Men’s Goalkeeper of the Year – Yashin Trophy: Unai Simón (Athletic Club / Spain)
- Women’s Goalkeeper of the Year: Cata Coll (Barcelona / Spain)
- Men’s Best Striker – Gerd Müller Trophy: Harry Kane (Bayern Munich / England)
- Women’s Best Striker – Gerd Müller Trophy: Charlyn Corral (Pachuca / Mexico)
- Men’s Club of the Year: Paris Saint-Germain
- Women’s Club of the Year: Barcelona Femení
- Socrates Award – Humanitarian: Bukayo Saka (Arsenal / England)
The assessment period for the 2026 awards ran from August 3, 2025 to July 19, 2026, including international competitions, with winners decided by specialist journalists voting for their top 10 players.
Kane succeeds Ousmane Dembélé, who won the 2025 edition in Paris.
By Son Tertsea, Abuja
The Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) has received FIFA’s endorsement of the Normalisation Committee to run Nigeria’s football administration pending fresh elections into the federation’s Executive Committee.
The approval was conveyed on Thursday by the Bureau of the FIFA Council, putting to rest months of uncertainty over the leadership model for the Nigerian football following the departure of former NFF president Ibrahim Gusau and other board members.
FIFA through its Secretary-General, Mattias Grafström, wrote a letter addressed to Dr Emmanuel Ikpeme, saying FIFA in conjunction with the Confederation of African Football (CAF) would fill the committee with a suitable number of members.
“The normalisation committee shall consist of a suitable number of members, who will be appointed jointly by FIFA and CAF as soon as possible,” the letter stated.
FIFA said the committee’s mandate would end once it had completed its assigned responsibilities, but set 31 May 2027 as the final deadline for the conclusion of its work.
The letter further stressed that members of the committee would not be eligible to contest any of the positions to be filled during the forthcoming NFF elections. The letter stated:
“None of the members of the normalisation committee will be eligible for the positions to be filled during the upcoming NFF elections under any circumstances.”
The appointment is expected to pave the way for an interim administrative arrangement and fresh elections to restore an elected leadership to the NFF.
Until the committee is appointed, the NFF Secretariat will continue to handle the federation’s day-to-day administration and the running of football in the country.
The development follows consultations between FIFA and CAF officials and Nigerian football stakeholders over the way forward for the country’s embattled football administration.
The composition of the committee and the details of its specific responsibilities are expected to be announced by FIFA and CAF in due course.
Sports
How FG’s Docility and FIFA’s Compromise on Mpasi Conspired Against Nigeria’s 2026 W’Cup Qualifier– Report
The apex world soccer’s governing body, FIFA, knew that the Democratic Republic of Congo fielded an ineligible player in the 2026 World Cup qualifier game played against the Super Eagles of Nigeria, The New York Times has learnt.
The match, which was held in November 2025 in Rabat, Morocco, was the final of the CAF play-offs for a spot in the intercontinental tournament.
DR Congo won 4-3 on penalties after the match ended 1-1.
According to the report published on Tuesday, FIFA’s own legal officials had privately determined that Congo had breached player eligibility rules after goalkeeper Lionel Mpasi failed to complete the required documentation to switch his international affiliation from France, where he had represented youth teams.
Despite the finding, FIFA allowed Mpasi to continue playing, and Congo went on to defeat Jamaica in March to secure its first World Cup appearance in 52 years.
The development has raised fresh questions over FIFA’s handling of Nigeria’s complaint against Congo, which came after the Central African side defeated the Super Eagles on penalties in the African play-off final in November 2025.
The defeat condemned Nigeria to a second consecutive World Cup miss, after also missing out on the 2022 edition in Qatar.
In December 2025, the Nigeria Football Federation lodged a complaint with FIFA alleging that Congo had fielded players who were not properly eligible to represent the country.
The NFF’s complaint questioned the clearance of several foreign-born players, including Mpasi, and alleged that the Congolese federation had misled FIFA in securing their eligibility.
Documents and correspondence reviewed by The New York Times, alongside information from a senior official directly involved in the case, showed that FIFA officials had considered several possible sanctions against Congo, including awarding the match to Nigeria, imposing fines, replacing Congo with Nigeria in the play-off against Jamaica or taking no action on the grounds that Nigeria had filed its complaint late.
Under FIFA rules, fielding an ineligible player can result in a team forfeiting the match in which the player featured, as FIFA had previously taken a more decisive position in similar cases.
In 2016, FIFA sanctioned Greece after it fielded an ineligible player who had previously represented Australia at youth level, awarding a 3-0 defeat in its match against Turkey. Two years later, the governing body changed the results of two Bolivia World Cup qualifying matches after determining that Bolivia had fielded a player who had previously represented Paraguay.
At the time FIFA was reviewing the Congo eligibility case, Véron Mosengo-Omba, an ally of Infantino, was preparing to contest for the presidency of the Congolese football federation.
Two months later, following Congo’s qualification for the World Cup, Mosengo-Omba emerged as the sole candidate and was elected president after eight other contenders had either withdrawn or been disqualified following changes to eligibility rules.
Cameroonian former FIFA official Prince Zelkifli Rahman Ngoufonja, popularly known as Prince Zul, said the relationship between Infantino and Mosengo-Omba raised questions over the potential consequences of FIFA removing Congo from the World Cup.
“If FIFA removed Congo from the World Cup,” he said, Infantino’s ally’s prospects “could have been damaged.”
Mosengo-Omba, however, said he was unaware of FIFA’s findings regarding Mpasi’s eligibility.
The Punch
FG Gives Workers N70,000 Monthly Transport Support for Six Months
Spread the loveBy Nick Ibe, Abuja To cushion the harsh impact of rising living costs, the Federal Government has approved...
Trump and the 95-year Mother: Government That Cares for All Citizens
Spread the love“Trump… Please bring my son back to me. I am begging you for mercy.” And what Trump did...
Probe Panel Says Heat, Dehydration Killed 33 Detained Niger Miners
Spread the love–Calls for NSCDC reforms, compensation for victims By Son Tertsea, Abuja Dehydration was cause of the death of...
Tinubu Seeks Law To Bring Back Nigerians Jailed Abroad
Spread the loveBy Felix Umande President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has transmitted a bill to the Senate seeking to empower the...
Senate Says: Travel Agencies, Short-let Apartments Need Closer Scrutiny in Human Trafficking Probe
Spread the loveBy Isa Abdul, Abuja As part of efforts to dismantle trafficking networks and protect Nigerians from exploitation abroad,...
El Niño: Its Meaning, Effects and How Nigerians Should Prepare for It
Spread the loveBy Son Tertsea, Abuja Nigerians have been alerted that El Niño event would raise concerns that potentially affect...
Accusations of Data Theft: MTN Explains How Nigerians Consume Data Fast
Spread the loveBy Nick Ibe, Abuja: Engaging in high-resolution video streaming, automatic downloads, background applications, cloud backups and increased internet...
Kogi Authorities Probe Why Police Corporal Killed female Colleague, Self
Spread the loveBy Michael Lim The Kogi State Police Command has begun to probe why a police corporal, Amos Yusuf,...
WHO Declares Nigeria Ebola-Free After Evacuation of Patient to Switzerland
Spread the loveBy Nick Ibe, Abuja Dr Mohamed Janabi, the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) Regional Director for Africa, says Nigeria...
Fake Letter Lands Atiku Supporter in Court
Spread the loveBy Isa Abdul, Abuja For circulating a fake document purportedly written by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to the...